Thursday, July 26, 2012
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Monday, July 16, 2012
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
MY GUIDE TO CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD OF EVENTS
MY GUIDE TO CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD OF EVENTS
JULY 16, 2012........Mailed application for WWTP operator examination
/certification together with the CREDENTIALS
JULY 24, 2012.......Check payment ($95) payable to STATE WATER RESOURCES
CONTROL BOARD drawn against my checking account.
JULY 25, 2012 ...... I was separated from employment. Commendations and Recommendations received from Mr. Tyler Case,
OWNER AND PLANT MANAGER NEW LEAF BIOFUEL and
JULY 26, 2012 Ms. Portia Smith, OWNER, PERSONNEL MANAGER NEW
LEAF BIOFUEL.
AUGUST 2, 2012...Ms Debbie Zuccala wrote and sent me through regular mail a
letter of DENIAL of my operator examination/certification application.
AUGUST 8, 2012.. a) I received the DENIAL letter on my operator examination/certification
application sent by Ms Debbie Zuccala through regular mail.
b) I sent a reply to Ms Debbie Zuccala telling clarifications and
posting some questions through E-MAIL.
AUGUST 14, 2012..resent E-MAIL to Ms. Debbie Zuccala dated August 8. 2012.
AUGUST 15, 2012..WAITED.. I got no reply.
a) resent THIRD FOLLOW UP E-MAIL to Ms. Debbie Zuccala
FOR E-MAIL dated August 8, 2012.
AUGUST 16, 2012.. WAITED.. I got no reply.
. a) resent E-MAIL to Ms. Debbie Zuccala through USPS certified mail.
SEE RECEIPT HERE
AUGUST 20, 2012..Linda Vista Post Office confirmed "her" office received
the certified mail on this date.
AUGUST 29, 2012..Certain Ms. Anna Hernandez, wrote a DENIAL LETTER for a WWTP
Operator Certification examination . She processed my application
though my application was deficient being a form for WWTP Operator
Certification. Deficient applications shall not be processed as per
regulation. Besides she should have seek an endorsement from
Ms. Debbie Zuccala so that issues and questions I posted for
Ms Debbie Zuccala could be addressed accordingly. I waited for
Ms. Debbie Zuccala to respond.
AUGUST 29, 2012 MY COMMENTS TO HERNANDEZ DENIAL LETTER
SEPTEMBER 6, 2012..WAITED.. I got no reply
a) I wrote a letter to Ms. Debbie Zuccala
with subject, " IGNORED E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS DEMONSTRATING INCOMPETENCY, INEFFICIENCY
AND INEXCUSABLE NEGLECT OF DUTY"
by certified mail.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2012...WAITED..I got no reply Certified mail receipt HERE for
letter sent to Ms. Debbie Zuccala dated September 6, 2012
SEPTEMBER 12, 2012...WAITED..I got no reply from Ms. Debbie Zuccala but
a) certain Ms. Christine Gordon responded to the letter not
addressed to her, first count of discourtesy.
b) sent e-mail reply to certain Ms. Christine Gordon
SEPTEMBER 13, 2012...Certain Christine Gordon
replied but just asking for a phone to contact me.
Why asked for a phone to contact me , where in my CERTIFICATION
APPLICATION FORM, I have filled in NONE for my telephone number?
Why not communicate with me through my active e-mail address?
SEPTEMBER 14, 2012...Ms. Debbie Zuccala replied but just asked for a phone to
contact me with. Again, why asked for a phone number, where she
already have my active e-mail address? She knew well that I have
no phone to contact me with as this information was clearly filled up in
my CERTIFICATION APPLICATION.
SEPTEMBER 15, 2012...sent E-MAIL response to Ms. Debbie Zuccala ASKING HER
WHY SHE USED A DIFFERENT E-MAIL ADDRESS.
SEPTEMBER 22, 2012.. WAITED..I got no reply
a) Sent E-MAIL to Ms. Debbie Zuccala telling her I have no phone.
SEPTEMBER 24, 2012...
a) Received E-MAIL from certain Ms. Christine Gordon,
(second count of discourtesy, replying to e-mail not addressed to
her) claiming to be Ms. Debbie Zuccala's manager.
b) Received E-MAIL from certain Mr. Wes Wilkinson.
(first count of discourtesy, replying to e-mail not addresed to him)
claiming to be Ms. Debbie Zuccala's manager.
SEPTEMBER 25, 2012..
a) Sent reply to certain Ms. Christine Gordon
b) Sent reply to certain Mr. Wes Wilkinson.
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012...WAITED..I got no reply
OCTOBER 1, 2012 ....Sent E-MAIL to Ms. Debbie Zuccala with subject
"TWO PERSONS CLAIMING TO BE YOUR MANAGER
...VERY CONFUSING"
OCTOBER 4, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL
b) Received AUTOMATIC reply from Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
OCTOBER 10, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the THIRD TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
OCTOBER 15, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a)Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the FOURTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
OCTOBER 17, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a)Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the FIFTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
OCTOBER 22, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the SIXTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
b) Received a TWENTY WORDED reply from certain
Ms. Christine Gordon
OCTOBER 23, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the SEVENTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
OCTOBER 28, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the EIGHT TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala
NOVEMBER 5, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the NINTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
NOVEMBER 12, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the TENTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
DECEMBER 12, 2012....WAITED...I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL through CERTIFIED MAIL.
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
b) Certified mail receipt here.
YEAR 2013
JANUARY 12, 2013......WAITED....I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL through CERTIFIED MAIL with
RESTRICTED DELIVERY REQUIREMENT for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
b)Please see USPS receipts here.
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
YEAR 2012
/certification together with the CREDENTIALS
JULY 24, 2012.......Check payment ($95) payable to STATE WATER RESOURCES
CONTROL BOARD drawn against my checking account.
JULY 25, 2012 ...... I was separated from employment. Commendations and Recommendations received from Mr. Tyler Case,
OWNER AND PLANT MANAGER NEW LEAF BIOFUEL and
JULY 26, 2012 Ms. Portia Smith, OWNER, PERSONNEL MANAGER NEW
LEAF BIOFUEL.
ORDEALS
WITH MS. DEBBIE ZUCCALA, MS. ANNA HERNANDEZ
MR. WES WILKINSON AND MS. CHRISTINE GORDON
AUGUST 2, 2012...Ms Debbie Zuccala wrote and sent me through regular mail a
letter of DENIAL of my operator examination/certification application.
AUGUST 8, 2012.. a) I received the DENIAL letter on my operator examination/certification
application sent by Ms Debbie Zuccala through regular mail.
b) I sent a reply to Ms Debbie Zuccala telling clarifications and
posting some questions through E-MAIL.
AUGUST 14, 2012..resent E-MAIL to Ms. Debbie Zuccala dated August 8. 2012.
AUGUST 15, 2012..WAITED.. I got no reply.
a) resent THIRD FOLLOW UP E-MAIL to Ms. Debbie Zuccala
FOR E-MAIL dated August 8, 2012.
AUGUST 16, 2012.. WAITED.. I got no reply.
. a) resent E-MAIL to Ms. Debbie Zuccala through USPS certified mail.
SEE RECEIPT HERE
AUGUST 20, 2012..Linda Vista Post Office confirmed "her" office received
the certified mail on this date.
AUGUST 29, 2012..Certain Ms. Anna Hernandez, wrote a DENIAL LETTER for a WWTP
Operator Certification examination . She processed my application
though my application was deficient being a form for WWTP Operator
Certification. Deficient applications shall not be processed as per
regulation. Besides she should have seek an endorsement from
Ms. Debbie Zuccala so that issues and questions I posted for
Ms Debbie Zuccala could be addressed accordingly. I waited for
Ms. Debbie Zuccala to respond.
AUGUST 29, 2012 MY COMMENTS TO HERNANDEZ DENIAL LETTER
SEPTEMBER 6, 2012..WAITED.. I got no reply
a) I wrote a letter to Ms. Debbie Zuccala
with subject, " IGNORED E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS DEMONSTRATING INCOMPETENCY, INEFFICIENCY
AND INEXCUSABLE NEGLECT OF DUTY"
by certified mail.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2012...WAITED..I got no reply Certified mail receipt HERE for
letter sent to Ms. Debbie Zuccala dated September 6, 2012
SEPTEMBER 12, 2012...WAITED..I got no reply from Ms. Debbie Zuccala but
a) certain Ms. Christine Gordon responded to the letter not
addressed to her, first count of discourtesy.
b) sent e-mail reply to certain Ms. Christine Gordon
SEPTEMBER 13, 2012...Certain Christine Gordon
replied but just asking for a phone to contact me.
Why asked for a phone to contact me , where in my CERTIFICATION
APPLICATION FORM, I have filled in NONE for my telephone number?
Why not communicate with me through my active e-mail address?
SEPTEMBER 14, 2012...Ms. Debbie Zuccala replied but just asked for a phone to
contact me with. Again, why asked for a phone number, where she
already have my active e-mail address? She knew well that I have
no phone to contact me with as this information was clearly filled up in
my CERTIFICATION APPLICATION.
SEPTEMBER 15, 2012...sent E-MAIL response to Ms. Debbie Zuccala ASKING HER
WHY SHE USED A DIFFERENT E-MAIL ADDRESS.
SEPTEMBER 22, 2012.. WAITED..I got no reply
a) Sent E-MAIL to Ms. Debbie Zuccala telling her I have no phone.
SEPTEMBER 24, 2012...
a) Received E-MAIL from certain Ms. Christine Gordon,
(second count of discourtesy, replying to e-mail not addressed to
her) claiming to be Ms. Debbie Zuccala's manager.
b) Received E-MAIL from certain Mr. Wes Wilkinson.
(first count of discourtesy, replying to e-mail not addresed to him)
claiming to be Ms. Debbie Zuccala's manager.
SEPTEMBER 25, 2012..
a) Sent reply to certain Ms. Christine Gordon
b) Sent reply to certain Mr. Wes Wilkinson.
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012...WAITED..I got no reply
OCTOBER 1, 2012 ....Sent E-MAIL to Ms. Debbie Zuccala with subject
"TWO PERSONS CLAIMING TO BE YOUR MANAGER
...VERY CONFUSING"
OCTOBER 4, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL
b) Received AUTOMATIC reply from Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
OCTOBER 10, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the THIRD TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
OCTOBER 15, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a)Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the FOURTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
OCTOBER 17, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a)Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the FIFTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
OCTOBER 22, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the SIXTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
b) Received a TWENTY WORDED reply from certain
Ms. Christine Gordon
OCTOBER 23, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the SEVENTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
OCTOBER 28, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the EIGHT TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala
NOVEMBER 5, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the NINTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
NOVEMBER 12, 2012..WAITED..I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL for the TENTH TIME
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
DECEMBER 12, 2012....WAITED...I got no reply
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL through CERTIFIED MAIL.
for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
b) Certified mail receipt here.
YEAR 2013
a) Re sent October 1, 2012 E-MAIL through CERTIFIED MAIL with
RESTRICTED DELIVERY REQUIREMENT for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
b)Please see USPS receipts here.
January 22, 2013....Waited ....I got no reply
a) I requested for a DELIVERY CONFIRMATION of the letter dated
January 12, 2013 for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.
March 12, 2013... I waited until this date. I got no reply.
a) I sent certified mail to the Office of Operator Certification with title "
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE" and SUBJECT
" TWO PERSONS CLAIMING TO BE YOUR (Ms. Debbie Zuccala)
MANAGER....VERY CONFUSING complaint, with copies furnished to
Ms. Debbie Zuccala,Ms. Christine Gordon and Mr. Wes Wilkinson.
March 14. 2013...The certified mail which was sent on March 12, 2013 was
received by the Office of Operator Certification on this date.
May 21, 2013... I wrote an appeal letter to the AGENCY ADMINISTRATOR of the
California Water Resources Control Board under the FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. I attached thereto a set of copy of the letter dated March 12, 2013 with title
"REQUEST FOR RESPONSE" and subject (Ms Debbie Zuccala)
"TWO PERSONS CLAIMING TO BE YOUR MANAGER... VERY
CONFUSING complaint.
an office technician, but did not address the main issues on who
between Mr. Wes Wilkinson and Ms Christine Gordon is the
legally mandated manager of Ms Debbie Zuccala and failed to send
back my educational credentials covering the Bachelor of Science in Management Engineering as evaluated by ERES
(Educational Records Evaluation Service), Sacramento, CA.
June 12, 2013..I wrote an e-mail response to certain Mr. Andrew Cooper. I informed him
that as I saw it, he is obviously responding to a letter not addressed to
him and that act is discourtesy and usurpation of authority unless he could
send me proof that he has given the authority to respond by the Agency
Administrator, whom I requested that his/her name be given to me.
June 13, 2013...Sent e-mail again to Mr. Cooper asking for the name of the
ORDEAL WITH THE ASSISTANT DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DIVISION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
MR. JAMES MAUGHAN
June 19, 2013... Certain James Maughan replied as Mr. Cooper
failed to respond. Mr. James Maughan named himself
as the Deputy Director for the Division of Financial
Assistance.
June 20, 2013.... Sent e-mail to Mr. James Maughan telling him he had
committed two counts of discourtesy for RESPONDING to an
e-mail not addressed to him and meddling with Mr. Andrew Cooper's e-mail. June 20, 2013...Mr. James Maughan claims he is the Agency
Administrator.
June 21, 2013....Sent e-mail to Mr. James Maughan questioning
his claim being the Agency Administrator of the
California State Water Resources Control Board
.
June 21, 2013....Mr. James Maughan alibi, there is no Agency
Administrator but Executive Director of the CSWRCB
and named him Mr. Tom Howard and he wanted that
Maughan communicate with me first.
June 24, 2013...Sent email to Mr. James Maughan asking him who did
of the CWRCB. IS HE, MR. TOM HOWARD OR
YOU, MR. JAMES MAUGHAN?
JUNE 24, 2013... CONFUSING AND RATTLED response by Mr. James Maughan. June 25, 2013... Email for Mr. James Maughan with comments about
his confusing information or answer to the QUESTION who
opened up the certified mail for the Agency Administrator.
Maughan did not reply on this email.
June 26, 2013... Sent email for James Maughan reiterating request return
of my ERES ORIGINAL EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS
June 26, 2013... email from MAUGHAN saying HE'S SENDING BACK
JULY 1, 2013...Email for James Maughan protesting for just sending
and worse without the signatures of Debbie Zuccala,
Anna Hernandez, Wes Wilkinson and James Maughan
as proof that all of them had examined that piece of document
could not merit a minimum 6 point requirement for operator
examination.
JULY 5, 2013....EMAIL from James Maughan saying what he sent me
is THE SAME EXACT DOCUMENT of the EDUCATIONAL
CREDENTIALS which I sent to them.
July 8, 2013...Email for James Maughan reiterating request for the
ORIGINALS of my submitted educational credential signed
by Anna Hernandez, Wes Wilkinson and James Maughan
as proof that the ERES educational credential that I submitted
could not merit the minimum 6 point educational requirement for
GRADE 1 OPERATOR EXAMINATION.
July 19, 2013...EMAIL DATED JULY 18, 2013 SENT ON JULY 19, 2013.
Re sent July 8, 2013 email for James Maughan reiterating
the return of my original educational credentials which I mentioned
I have been requesting it since September 12, 2012.
JULY 19, 2013...Email from Maughan still asking me to send my school
transcript of records when I already told them that if my Bachelors
of Science in Management Engineering degree as examined by
ERES could not merit the minimum 6 educational point then
I submitted to Debbie Zuccala with signatures of Anna Hernandez,
Wes Wilkinson and he himself, James Maughan. But, Maughan
just return photocopies of my educational credentials and worse,
without any signature of anyone of them. Maughan insisted talking
with me through telephone to be paid by Maughan himself, which
I declined for the simple reason that Maughan has the propensity
of cheating and lying in duly recorded email communications how
can I trust to talk to this man through the unrecorded phone
conversations. Maughan just wanted an easy way out by more
cheating and lying as much as he wanted through the phone,
as I have said those conversations are not recorded and weak
as to evidentiary value.
July 22, 2013... Email for Mr. James Maughan reiterating my continuing AUGUST 16, 2013... Resend July 22, 2013 email for Maughan due to
Maughan absence for two weeks.
AUGUST 29, 2013... EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN for him to acknowledge receipt
of emails dated July 22 and August 16, 2013 and failure
to respond would mean he would want me to write to
Ms. Liz Haven next in the hierarchy in ten (10) days
AUGUST 30, 2013...EMAIL FROM MAUGHAN He did not introduce me to
Ms. Liz Haven and wrote he had nothing else to give
in other words he is denying keeping my educational
credential originals with them.
SEPTEMBER 9, 2013... EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN...why was the word
"PHILIPPINES" in the first page photocopy of my
educational credentials is marked with a circle.
That's reason I believe that they do not want to
return the original copy of it. That circular mark
around the word "PHILIPPINES" MEANS AN
WILL BE MORE EVIDENT AND REPREHENSIBLE
WHEN SEEN ON THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT.
SEPTEMBER 23, 2013...EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN...continuing demand
with signatures thereon of Anna Hernandez,
Wes Wilkinson and James Maughan.
SEPTEMBER 23, 2013....EMAIL FROM MAUGHAN... Maughan wrote,
" If this document was not the "original" then the only thing I can
Maughan should have inform me on June 26, 2013
the day he sent me back my educational credentials
that the copy with them are not original but a copy.
He should have deny the existence of the original
copy of my educational credentials in their file.
He should have presented me statement from Debbie Zuccala under oath that what she recieved from me are mere photocopies and not original ones.
As proof of this fact, it is Maughan himself informed
me that he is placing in the mail (certified mail) on
this day back to me originals of my educational
credentials as I requested.
To wit what he had written:
"Mr. Buensuceso, I am placing in the mail (certified mail) today back
to you: originals of your educational credentials as you requested."
Maughan is a learned man and knows the difference
between original copy and a photocopy. Since
Maughan wrote he's sending back to me the originals
of my educational credentials as I requested then
send me back to me just photocopies of it, then James
Maughan is undeniably cheating and does it continually.
SEPTEMBER 30, 2013... EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN...Maughan unleashed a
plethora of incredible alibis to avoid culpability.
OCTOBER 30, 2013... EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN...continuing demand return of
of the original educational credentials with signatures
thereon of Anna Hernandez, Wes Wilkinson and
James Maughan.
NOVEMBER 30, 2013... EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN.. continuing demand return of
the original educational credentials with signatures
thereon of Anna Hernandez, Wes Wilkinson and
before I write to Ms. Liz Haven.
DECEMBER 9, 2013... EMAIL FROM MAUGHAN...lying he's not witholding my
original educational credentials and my comments thereto
dated December 16, 2013 proving Maughan is lying.
DECEMBER 19, 2013...EMAIL FROM MAUGHAN telling me email addresses of
Liz Haven and Jonathan Bishop and still refusing to send
back to me my original educational credentials and my
response thereto dated December 30, 2013.
DECEMBER 30, 2013... EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN thanking Maughan for giving
email addresses of Liz Haven and Jonathan Bishop
and continuing demand return of my original educational
credentials.
DECEMBER 30, 2013...EMAIL FROM MAUGHAN still refusing to return my
original educational credentials and weakling alibis.
demand return of my original educational credentials.
FEBRUARY 16, 2014... EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN persuasive appeal continuing
demand return of my original educational credentials.
Maughan the only one denying the existence of my
original educational credentials up to this time.
FEBRUARY 18, 2014...CERTIFIED MAIL FROM TOM HOWARD... just butted in
without any endorsement from James Maughan..
FEBRUARY 23, 2014...EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN...informing him that he had not
responded to my email since dated January 30, 2014.
The fact that Mr. Tom Howard just butted in the middle
of our discussion without any endorsement from Maughan
as he went hiding validated the notion that this agency
is composed of discourteous people. Or, they may actually
My demand remained send me back the original of my
educational credentials.
MARCH 2, 2014...EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN...4th persuasive appeal continuing demand
return of my original educational credentials.
MARCH 15, 2014...EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN...5th persuasive appeal continuing
demand return of my educational credentials.
MARCH 30, 2014...EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN ...6th persuasive appeal continuing
demand return of my original educational credentials.
APRIL 20, 2014...EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN...7th persuasive appeal continuing
demand return of my original educational credentials.
MAY 11, 2014...EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN... 8th persuasive appeal continuing
demand return of my original educational credentials.
MAY 28, 2014...EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN...9th persuasive appeal continuing
demand return of my original educational credentials.
JUNE 28, 2014...EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN...10th persuasive appeal continuing
demand return of my original educational credentials.
JULY 20, 2014...EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN...INQUIRY UNDER THE FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION ACT ... I did my own research and read
Mr. Tom Howard email address and wrote Mr. Maughan to confirm it.
JULY 21, 2014...EMAIL FROM MAUGHAN...responded and gave me
JULY 22, 2014...EMAIL FOR MAUGHAN... gave thanks to Mr. Maughan.
Information Act and seven (7) months of even more
painful and agonizing months of constantly pleading
and patiently waiting for your response from
and ethics guided me to be gracious.
So, thank you so much for your response."
MAUGHAN OUT OF THE BLUE JUST BUTTED IN THE DISCUSSION BETWEEN MR. HOWARD AND ME
MARCH 13, 2015 to MARCH 27, 2015 ELEVEN(11) EMAILS FOR
MAUGHAN ... ON HIS DISCOURTEOUS ACT
OF RESPONDING TO AN EMAIL NOT ADDRESSED
TO HIM ON THE INQUIRY POSED FOR
MR. TOM HOWARD ON SUBJECT:
BUT WHEN ASKED TO RESPOND
HE JUST FLEE AND HIDE.
THIS INCIDENT VALIDATED THE
FACT THAT BASED ON MY
EXPERIENCES DEALING WITH
DEBBIE ZUCCALA, ANNA HERNANDEZ,
WES WILKINSON, CHRISTINE GORDON,
ANDREW COOPER, JAMES MAUGHAN
AND TOM HOWARD, PARDON ME,
IN THEM PERMEATES THE CULTURE
OF DISCOURTESY TO THE PERSON WHOM THEY WANTED TO DISCRIMINATE.
ORDEAL WITH THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
MR. TOM HOWARD
July 23, 2014-xxxx xx 20xx
JULY 23, 2014...EMAIL FOR MR. TOM HOWARD...Inquiry under the
Freedom of Information Act...confirmation of
authenticity of the certified mail sent to me
dated February 18, 2014, with an inquiry, "Did
you prepare and sign that certified mail dated
February 18, 2014.
JULY 23, 2014...EMAIL FROM MR. TOM HOWARD...where he
responded, " Yes, I signed that letter."
JULY 24, 2014...EMAIL FOR HOWARD...Inquiry under FOIA ...
Assumption of full accountability and
responsibility on the matters discussed
in the certified mail dated February 18, 2014
AUGUST 24, 2014...EMAIL FOR HOWARD...FIRST FOLLOW UP...
Inquiry under FOIA... Assumption of full
accountability and responsibility on the matters
discussed in the certified mail dated
February 18, 2014 though it was prepared
by someone else.
SEPTEMBER 15, 2014...EMAIL FOR HOWARD..SECOND FOLLOW UP...
Inquiry under FOIA.... Assumption of full
accountability and responsibility on the matters
discussed in the certified mail dated
February 18, 2014 though it was prepared not by
him but by someone else.
OCTOBER 6, 2014... EMAIL FOR HOWARD...THIRD FOLLOW UP...
Inquiry under FOIA...Assumption of full
accountability and responsibility on the matters
discussed in the certified mail dated
February 18, 2014 though it was prepared not by
him but by someone else.
OCTOBER 20, 2014...EMAIL FOR HOWARD..."Since I did get a response
from you (Howard) after 3 follow ups from August 24,
2014 to October 6, 2014 now therefor we have a
common understanding that you(Howard) is assuming
discussed in the certified mail dated February 18, 2014
though it was prepared not by you (Howard) but by
someone else. Now, show me my letter addressed
to you dated October 6, 2012. Failure on your part to
show that piece of document would mean absolutely
that you (Howard) is lying and cheating.
NOVEMBER 11, 2014...EMAIL FOR HOWARD...Lying or cheating
confirmed re letter October 6, 2012 proven to be
not existing.
DECEMBER 1, 2014...EMAIL FOR HOWARD...Inquiry about
Debbie Zuccala's errors, acts and omissions whether
or not she acted on her own.
DECEMBER 22, 2014.. EMAIL FOR HOWARD...Failure to respond count 1
on the question, "Did Debbie Zuccala acted on her own."
JANUARY 20, 2015...EMAIL DATED JANUARY 12, 2015 FOR
HOWARD...Subject : Deficient applications shall
not be processed.
JANUARY 30, 2015...EMAIL FOR HOWARD...Record of Mr. Tom Howard
COMPILATION OF THE CONTINUING FACT FINDING EMAILS
UNDER CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT AND FOIA
IN PURSUANCE OF PROBING THE ACTS AND OMISSIONS
BY SWRCB AGENCY AND MR. HOWARD AND HIS
EMPLOYEES AGAINST MY PERSON TO SUPPORT
DISCRIMINATION CHARGES AGAINST THEM
FROM JANUARY 30, 2015 CONTINUALLY UP TO
JUNE 28, 2019.
FOR RESPECTIVE
YEAR 2015 emails for HOWARD
YEAR 2016 emails for HOWARD
YEAR 2017 emails for HOWARD
YEAR 2018 emails for HOWARD
YEAR 2019
SEE BLOG ARCHIVE NEXT FOR THEYEAR'S CORRESPONDING EMAILS
JUNE 28, 2019....EMAIL FOR HOWARD...
(with links supplied to pertinent documents)
UNEARTHED FROM THE RECORD OF MR. HOWARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY AS OF JUNE 28, 2019, from FEBRUARY 18, 2014 to June 28, 2019.
REQUEST RETURN
JULY 17, 2019...EMAIL DATED JULY 16, 2019 FOR HOWARD....Request Return of
Educational Evaluation Documents Original "ERES"
and the $95 Application Fee.
JULY 18, 2019...EMAIL FOR HOWARD...Request Return of
Educational Evaluation Documents Original "ERES"
and the $95 Application Fee.
DEMAND RETURN
SEPTEMBER 19, 2019...EMAIL FOR HOWARD...Demand Return of Original
$95 Application Fee.
of Original "ERES" Educational Evaluation
Documents and the $95 Application Fee.
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
NOVEMBER 21, 2019...EMAIL FOR HOWARD... Exhaustion of
Administrative Remedies Reiteration of
Demand Return of Original "ERES"
Educational Evaluation Documents and
the $95 Application Fee.
DECEMBER 20, 2019...EMAIL FOR HOWARD...Exhaustion of
Administrative Remedies Reiteration of
Demand Return of Original "ERES"
Educational Evaluation Documents and
the $95 Application Fee.
YEAR 2020
JANUARY 31, 2020...EMAIL FOR HOWARD... Exhaustion of
Administrative Remedies Reiteration of
Demand Return of Original "ERES"
Educational Evaluation Documents and
the $95 Application Fee.
FEBRUARY 28, 2020...EMAIL FOR HOWARD... Exhaustion of
Administrative Remedies Reiteration of
Demand Return of Original "ERES"
Educational Evaluation Documents and
the $95 Application Fee.
MARCH 31, 2020...EMAIL FOR HOWARD... Exhaustion of
Administrative Remedies Reiteration of
Demand Return of Original "ERES"
Educational Evaluation Documents and
the $95 Application Fee.
APRIL 30, 2020...EMAIL FOR HOWARD... Exhaustion of
Administrative Remedies Reiteration of
Demand Return of Original "ERES"
Educational Evaluation Documents and
the $95 Application Fee.
MAY 28, 2020...EMAIL FOR HOWARD... Exhaustion of
Administrative Remedies Reiteration of
Demand Return of Original "ERES"
Educational Evaluation Documents and
the $95 Application Fee.
JUNE 30, 2020...EMAIL FOR HOWARD... Exhaustion of
Administrative Remedies Reiteration of
Demand Return of Original "ERES"
Educational Evaluation Documents and
the $95 Application Fee.
JULY 31, 2020...EMAIL FOR HOWARD... Exhaustion of
Administrative Remedies Reiteration of
Demand Return of Original "ERES"
Educational Evaluation Documents and
the $95 Application Fee.
AUGUST 31, 2020...EMAIL FOR HOWARD... Exhaustion of
Administrative Remedies Reiteration of
Demand Return of Original "ERES"
Educational Evaluation Documents and
the $95 Application Fee.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











