|
Sep 23, 2013, 8:28 PM
|  | ||
| ||||
Mr. Buensuceso,
I do recognize and acknowledge that you have made the same request several times. This request concerns us returning to you the original copy of your educational credentials. We did return exactly what you sent us, and would point out that the document we sent you back has our original date and time stamp. We place a date stamp on original documents that we receive in our office.
If this document was not the "original" then the only thing I can conclude is that you never sent the "original" to us but a copy.
Concerning the word "PHILIPPINES" being circled on the document we sent back to you, this is done routinely to annotate pertinent information on documents that we review. We gladly accept education credits from many countries including the Philippines.
Again to state we accepted the document in full faith but needed further clarifying information about specific classes taken in the course of you attaining your degree, so that we could give you the proper credit to take the exam.
Again I am sorry if this is not clear but I have stated this information several times.
James Maughan
ENLARGE VIEW OF THE FIRST PAGE OF MY EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIAL
COMMENTS
ANNA HERNANDEZ, WES WILKINSON AND JAMES MAUGHAN HAVE BEEN
REQUESTED TO SIGN THESE DOCUMENTS AS PROOF THEY HAVE CONSCIENTIOUSLY
EXAMINED AND ANNOTATED THESE DOCUMENTS. ALL OF THEM REFUSED TO SIGN AND
JAMES MAUGHAN TOOK PRIDE IN RETURNING THIS "EXACT COPY" OF THE ORIGINAL WITH
THE CIRCULAR MARK AROUND THE WORD "PHILIPPINES" AND BELYING THIS MARK AS MERE ROUTINE MARK OF ANNOTATION. WHAT IS SIGNIFICANT WITH THE WORD "PHILIPPINES"
THAT THEY NEED TO PUT CIRCULAR MARK ON? BUT FORGET THE EVEN MORE SIGNIFICANT LIKE THEIR SIGNATURES AS ROUTINE MATTER OF ANNOTATION? THE CIRCULAR MARK AROUND THE WORD "PHILIPPINES" IS EQUALLY SIGNIFICANT TO THE MANNER MAUGHAN ET AL TREATED ME. BOTH ARE TANTAMOUNT TO RACIAL DISCRIMINATION.
No comments:
Post a Comment