from: antonio jr. Buensuceso antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com to: Beba.maletic@waterboards.ca.gov
cc: Jonathan.Bishop@waterboards.ca.gov,
neal.funston@waterboards.ca.gov,
anna.perez@waterboards.ca.gov,
rosalina buensuceso <rosebuensuceso@gmail.com>,
Noemi Buensuceso <mimikyut@yahoo.com>,
Aaron Buensuceso <aaronbuensuceso@gmail.com>,
veronica buensuceso <vcbuensuceso@gmail.com>,
"miriambuens@gmail.com" <miriambuens@gmail.com>,
Antonio Buensuceso <shellresearchworks@gmail.com>,
Mosses <buensucesom@gmail.com>
date: Mar 29, 2022, 10:40 AM subject: LETTER OF APOLOGY IS WARRANTED, 15TH COUNT. mailed-by: gmail.com
March 29, 2022
Beba Maletic Arsov
Assistant to Eileen Sobeck, Executive Director
State Water Resources Control Board
SUBJECT : LETTER OF APOLOGY IS WARRANTED, 15TH COUNT. RE _ ADMISSION OF DISCRIMINATION THROUGH WRITING OF DECEPTIVE OUTRAGEOUSLY FALSE INFORMATION
Dear Ms. Arsov,
| from: | antonio jr. Buensuceso antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com | ||
| to: | Beba.maletic@waterboards.ca.gov | ||
| cc: | Jonathan.Bishop@waterboards.ca.gov, neal.funston@waterboards.ca.gov, anna.perez@waterboards.ca.gov, rosalina buensuceso <rosebuensuceso@gmail.com>, Noemi Buensuceso <mimikyut@yahoo.com>, Aaron Buensuceso <aaronbuensuceso@gmail.com>, veronica buensuceso <vcbuensuceso@gmail.com>, "miriambuens@gmail.com" <miriambuens@gmail.com>, Antonio Buensuceso <shellresearchworks@gmail.com>, Mosses <buensucesom@gmail.com> | ||
| date: | Mar 29, 2022, 10:40 AM | ||
| subject: | LETTER OF APOLOGY IS WARRANTED, 15TH COUNT. | ||
| mailed-by: | gmail.com |
Beba Maletic Arsov
Assistant to Eileen Sobeck, Executive Director
State Water Resources Control Board
Good morning.
May I most humbly and respectfully inform you that according to my email dated 7 February 2022 coursed through Mr. Funston with subject : FUNSTON'S OUTRAGEOUSLY FALSE STATEMENTS, PLEASE READ INFO 1, the State Water Board together with Ms. Sobeck, Mr. Funston and you all, collectively, deemed admitted without objection and conformed to the established facts of the statement that the State Water Board, Ms. Sobeck, Mr. Funston and you, have committed and continue to be committing discrimination by deliberate, willful and intentional writing of deceptive outrageously false statements that the State Water Resources Control Board has responded as needed to the other claims in my emails, continues to disagree with my characterizations and has nothing further at this time. The facts showed that you have not. Instead of responding appropriately to my email with subject "CONTINUING INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION and CONTINUING INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS DATED DECEMBER 30, 2021, yet up to this time you kept your reprehensible deliberate silence about it; thereby, perpetrating continuing disrespect and scornful abuse tantamount to continuing hurling of injury and insult on me, your victim, whom suffered so much pain in account of your relentless collective discriminatory actions and omissions. Hence, aside from compensatory and other related damages in the amount of more than a million US dollars, a 15TH COUNT call for a sincere letter of apology be written and sent by Ms. Sobeck in my favor. PLEASE CONSIDER WRITING A SINCERE LETTER OF APOLOGY NOW NOT LATER TO MITIGATE THE GRAVITY OF YOUR COLLECTIVE WRONGDOINGS, MALFEASANCE, MISFEASANCE AND MISCONDUCTS.
MORE AFTER INFO 1.
INFO 1
Monday, February 7, 2022
NEIL FUNSTON DATED 7 FEBRUARY 2022 3:25AM
from: antonio jr. Buensuceso antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com to: neal.funston@waterboards.ca.gov
cc: Jonathan.Bishop@waterboards.ca.gov,
anna.perez@waterboards.ca.gov,
rosalina buensuceso <rosebuensuceso@gmail.com>,
Noemi Buensuceso <mimikyut@yahoo.com>,
Aaron Buensuceso <aaronbuensuceso@gmail.com>,
veronica buensuceso <vcbuensuceso@gmail.com>,
"miriambuens@gmail.com" <miriambuens@gmail.com>,
Antonio Buensuceso <shellresearchworks@gmail.com>,
Mosses <buensucesom@gmail.com>,
Beba.maletic@waterboards.ca.gov
date: Feb 7, 2022, 3:25 AM subject: FUNSTON'S OUTRAGEOUSLY FALSE STATEMENTS mailed-by: gmail.com
February 7, 2022
Neal Funston
Staff Services Manager I
Wastewater Operator Certification
Division of Financial Assistance
neal.funston@waterboards.ca. gov
State Water Resources Control Board
SUBJECT : FUNSTON'S OUTRAGEOUSLY FALSE STATEMENTS
| from: | antonio jr. Buensuceso antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com | ||
| to: | neal.funston@waterboards.ca.gov | ||
| cc: | Jonathan.Bishop@waterboards.ca.gov, anna.perez@waterboards.ca.gov, rosalina buensuceso <rosebuensuceso@gmail.com>, Noemi Buensuceso <mimikyut@yahoo.com>, Aaron Buensuceso <aaronbuensuceso@gmail.com>, veronica buensuceso <vcbuensuceso@gmail.com>, "miriambuens@gmail.com" <miriambuens@gmail.com>, Antonio Buensuceso <shellresearchworks@gmail.com>, Mosses <buensucesom@gmail.com>, Beba.maletic@waterboards.ca.gov | ||
| date: | Feb 7, 2022, 3:25 AM | ||
| subject: | FUNSTON'S OUTRAGEOUSLY FALSE STATEMENTS | ||
| mailed-by: | gmail.com |
Neal Funston
Staff Services Manager I
Wastewater Operator Certification
Division of Financial Assistance
neal.funston@waterboards.ca.
State Water Resources Control Board
Dear Mr. Funston,
Good morning.
I got the screenshot from INFO 1, from your email on January 10, 2022, showing you wrote to me an email on January 10, 2022 responding to my email with subject "CONTINUING INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION and CONTINUING INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS DATED DECEMBER 30, 2021 where you wrote as your third sentence response from INFO 2:
" The State Water Resources Control Board has responded as needed to the other claims in your emails, continues to disagree with your characterizations, and has nothing further at this time."
May I most respectfully comment that this statement is outrageously false, bereft of truth, insane and foolish. Why? Because I have voluminous files of documents which are showing fifty-seven (57) counts of failure to respond under the Public Records Act by Mr. Howard where claims associated with it are included in INFO 3. Then in INFO 4 the claims on seven (7) counts of failure to show or to institute corrective managerial action by Mr. Howard and in INFO 5 twenty-eight (28) claims of aggravating manifestations of institutionalizing discrimination and continuing infliction of emotional distress through deliberate and willful and intentional and repeated multiple times with impunity, mercilessly, continuing failure to show or institute corrective managerial action by Mr. Howard.These events are recorded in my email with subject "CONTINUING INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION and CONTINUING INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS DATED DECEMBER 30, 2021 have been conformed with by Mr. Howard. I have part of this email written again for you in INFO 3, INFO 4 and INFO 5 to read and understand that these are statements of real time and real events, not fictional, nor characterization which exist only in your mind and not in this real world.
These statements of facts are not characterizations or fictional, hence, you are continuing to disagree not on these statements of facts but on characterizations product of your own imagination, hence, baseless. Second, it is absolutely illogical to continue doing something you, you all collectively, have not started yet. Besides, again, these statement of facts have already been conformed with by Mr. Howard or whoever replaced him years back in June 2019 and the rest by other respective employees and the last being in August 2021 by Mr. Bishop. These are 57 plus 7 plus 28 counts of claims, a total of 92 counts of claims that you failed to respond to and have been deemed conformed with no objection respectively. Thus, making your statement outrageously false, bereft of truth, insane and foolish.
Moreover, writing "and has nothing further at this time." is an expression of you being a suspect trying to move away from the crime scene abandoning the mission Ms. Sobeck instructed you to do for me. May I most respectfully show you part of her instruction written by Ms. Sobeck that if I have any additional not previously addressed, please contact Mr. Neil Funston, you, may assist me and I quote in bold font: "or if have any additional qestions not previously addressed, please contact Mr. Neal Funston at neal.funston@waterboards.ca.gov so that he may assist you.In account of this act you, Mr. Funston, maybe liable to a charge of insubordination by Ms. Sobeck in disobeying her instructions. So, please, Mr. Funston, do obey her and save her office from shame for doing the things she had instructed you to do that you abandoned which she might be forced to do later.
Please do not be like Ms. Zuccala, Ms. Hernandez, Ms. Gordon, Mr. Wilkinson, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Maughan and Mr. Howard who just appear from nowhere and after committing misconducts, run, flee then hide. If only Ms.Zuccala gave me respect and did not run flee and hide, like Ms. Hernandez, Ms. Gordon, Mr. Wilkinson, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Maughan and Mr. Howard did and profusely refused to accord me respect we should have not gone this far that led you, all of you collectively hiding below the swamp of loathsome filth and dirt. May I most respectfully seek forgiveness for the harsh words that I have written because I am in continuing pain and needed to wake you up in your slumber that you think I am a pea brained Filipino that would not know anything about racial discrimination and the continuing violations doctrine. You need to come up to a realization that after committing misconducts, running, fleeing and hiding away from it, then seeking refuge inside the statutes of limitations are not the right thing to do. Please, help me. I am in pain and tremendous emotional distress and an indigent, an elderly, making your misconducts and wrongful acts and omissions against me shall be meted with stiffer penalties and please bear in mind, I just need respect from all of you but up to this time you prefer to run, flee and hide better than rendering respect to me.
MORE AFTER INFO 1 TO INFO 5.
INFO 1.
INFO 1.
INFO 3.
B. FAILURE TO RESPOND ON INQUIRY UNDER THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT BY HOWARD(57 counts)
DID ZUCCALA ACT ON HER OWN?COUNT 1 : Failure to respond to inquiry under the California Public Records Act by refusing to answer the question “Did Zuccala acted on her own?” and worse you did not give me an answer why that inquiry should not be responded to.
WHY PROCESS A DEFICIENT APPLICATION?COUNT 2 : Failure to respond on inquiry under the California Public Records Act by refusing to respond, in behalf of Ms. Zuccala, on the question why though my examination application was deficient, the agency through Ms. Zuccala still processes my application without giving me a chance to correct the deficiency. This is a clear display of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
WHY PROCESS AGAIN THE SAME DEFICIENT APPLICATION?COUNT 3 : Failure to respond on inquiry under the California Public Records Act by refusing to respond, on the question why though my examination application was deficient, the agency through Ms. Hernandez, after Ms. Zuccala, still processes the same application again without giving me a chance to correct the deficiency. These are outright violations of your own regulation done twice. These are clear displays of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person, unless you could show cause otherwise.
ACTIONS UNDERTAKEN VS WILKINSON AND GORDON?COUNT 4 : Failure to respond on inquiry under the California Public Records Act on the question what measures your agency have undertaken to correct the unethical conduct displayed by Ms. Gordon and Mr. Wilkinson against my person, specifically on September 24, 2012, where both of them knowingly sent me emails claiming to be manager for Ms. Zuccala purposely with the intention to confuse me and fool me around; they did have successfully confused me. These are clear displays of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person, unless you could show cause otherwise.
ACTIONS TAKEN ON TWO SITES FOR "TITLE 23" WITH DIFFERENT CONTENT?COUNT 5 : Failure to respond on inquiry under the California Public Records Act on the complaint that your agency intentionally maintain two links of similarly looking internet sites but with different content for Title 23_Waters and what measures your agency have undertaken to correct this “error causing scheme” detrimental on part of the applicants who might be misled by the old site and consequently commit errors and undergo another round of application and examination process, and pay another round of fees. It was noted that the scheme appears to be designed as a “scam” or money making trick victimizing gullible applicants as in my case when I have the chance to take the examinations.
ACTIONS TAKEN VS. ANDREW COOPER ?COUNT 6 : Failure to respond on inquiry under the California Public Records Act on the inquiry regarding whether you authorized or not Mr. Andrew Cooper to respond on your behalf on the letter dated May 21. 2013 addressed and intended for you.
ACTIONS TAKEN VS. MAUGHAN RE: WITHHOLDING MY ORIGINALS OF MY EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALSCOUNT 7 : Failure to respond on inquiry despite of 15 follow ups (from May 4 to May 22, 2015) under the California Public Records Act on the inquiry regarding whether did you advise or not Mr. James Maughan to WITHHOLD the original copy and send me back just a photocopy of the U.S. Equivalence of my Bachelor’s Degree in Management Engineering credential as evaluated by ERES, Sacramento, CA on his letter response on June 26, 2013.
ACTION TAKEN VS. MAUGHAN ON HIS DISHONESTY, DISCOURTESY AND USURPATION OF AUTHORITY?COUNT 8 : Failure to respond on inquiry despite of 15 follow ups ( from May 4 to May 22, 2015) under the California Public Records Act on the inquiry regarding whether did you tolerate or not actions of discourtesy and usurpation of authority by Mr. Maughan.
2015
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYCOUNT 9 : Failure to respond on inquiry despite of 25 email follow ups with subject :HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from May 26, 2015 to June 29, 2015)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYCOUNT 10 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails showing “TORTIOUS ORDEAL DEALING WITH MR. JAMES MAUGHAN” despite of 22 email follow ups with subject :HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from July 1, 2015 to July 30, 2015)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 11 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from August 3, 2015 to August 28, 2015)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 12 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 21 email follow ups with subject : HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from September 1, 2015 to September 29, 2015)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 13 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from October 1, 2015 to October 29, 2015)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 14 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from November 2, 2015 to November 27, 2015)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 15 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from December 1, 2015 to December 30, 2015)
2016
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 16 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 18 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from January 4, 2016 to January 29, 2016)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 17 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from February 1, 2016 to February 26, 2016)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF MARCH 31, 2016COUNT 18 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 22 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from March 1, 2016 to March 30, 2016)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF APRIL 29, 2016 COUNT 19 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 21 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from April 1, 2016 to April 29, 2016)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYCOUNT 20 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 21 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from May 2, 2016 to May 30, 2016)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF JUNE 30, 2016COUNT 21 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 21 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from June 1, 2016 to June 29, 2016)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYCOUNT 22 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from July 1, 2016 to July 28, 2016)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 23 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 22 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from August 1, 2016 to August 30, 2016)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 24 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from September 1, 2016 to September 29, 2016)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 25 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from October 3, 2016 to October 28, 2016.
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 26 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from November 1, 2016 to November 29, 2016.)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 27 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from December 1, 2016 to December 29, 2016.)
2017
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 28 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from January 3, 2017 to January 30, 2017.)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 29 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES” despite of 18 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from February 1, 2017 to February 27, 2017.)
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF MARCH 31, 2017COUNT 30 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 22 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from March 1, 2017 to March 31, 2017).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGHMANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYCOUNT 31 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from April 3, 2017 to April 27, 2017).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYCOUNT 32 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 22 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from May 1, 2017 to May 31, 2017).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF JUNE 30, 2017COUNT 33 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from June 1, 2017 to June 29, 2017).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF JULY 31, 2017
COUNT 34 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from July 3, 2017 to July 28, 2017).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 35 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 22 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from August 1, 2017 to August 30, 2017).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 36 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from September 1, 2017 to September 28, 2017).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 37 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from October 2, 2017 to October 30, 2017).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 38 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from November 1, 2017 to November 29, 2017).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 39 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from December 1, 2017 to December 28, 2017).
2018
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 40 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from January 2, 2018 to January 30, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 41 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 17 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from February 1, 2018 to February 27, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYCOUNT 42 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 21 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from March 1, 2018 to March 29, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF APRIL 30, 2018
COUNT 43 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from April 2, 2018 to April 30, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF MAY 31, 2018
COUNT 44 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 21 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from May 2, 2018 to May 30, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYCOUNT 45 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from June 1, 2018 to June 28, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF JULY 31, 2018
COUNT 46 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from July 2, 2018 to July 30, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 47 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 22 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from August 1, 2018 to August 30, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 48 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from September 4, 2018 to September 28, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGHMANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 49 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 22 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from October 1, 2018 to October 30, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 50 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 18 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from November 1, 2018 to November 29, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 51 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 18 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from December 3, 2018 to December 28, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 52 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from January 2, 2019 to January 30, 2019).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF COUNT 53 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 18 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from February 1, 2019 to February 27, 2019).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF MARCH 29, 2019
COUNT 54 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from March 1, 2019 to March 28, 2019).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYRECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD AS OF APRIL 30, 2019COUNT 55 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 21 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from April 1, 2019 to April 29, 2019).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYCOUNT 56 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 21 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from May 1, 2019 to May 30, 2019).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITYCOUNT 57 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from June 3, 2019 to June 28, 2019).
INFO 4.
C. FAILURE TO SHOW OR INSTITUTE CORRECTIVE MANAGERIAL ACTION BY HOWARD
(7 counts)
COUNT 1 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. James Maughan regarding the latter’s commission of usurpation of authority by responding on date 12 March 2015 to the email with subject : TWO LINKS for Title 23 Waters addressed to you. This is a clear display of you having tolerated Maughan’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 2 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. Andrew Cooper regarding the latter’s commission of usurpation of authority when he responded without having been authorized to the letter intended for you dated 21 May 2013 on April 9, 2015. This is a clear display of you having tolerated Cooper’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 3 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. Andrew Cooper regarding the latter’s commission of dishonesty when Cooper withheld the information about my educational credentials dated 13 April 2015 among others, when I inquired about this document from him. Again, this is a clear display of you having tolerated Cooper’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 4 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. James Maughan regarding the latter’s commission of usurpation of authority on 4 May 2015 when he responded to the letter dated May 21, 2013 where Maughan acknowledged, this letter was not addressed to him but to the State Water Resources Control Board Agency Administrator. Again, this is a clear display of you having tolerated Maughan’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 5 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. James Maughan on 22 May 2015 regarding the latter’s commission of cheating or dishonesty by informing me of sending original copy of my educational credentials but Maughan in fact sent me back just photocopies. Again, this is a clear display of you having tolerated Maughan’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 6 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. Wes Wilkinson and Ms. Christine regarding their collaborative effort to confuse me to drive culpability away from Ms. Debbie Zuccala who claimed to be both managers of Ms. Debbie Zuccala on September 24, 2012 which confused me on who between them to talk to. I have already discussed my complaint against Ms. Zuccala earlier with Ms. Gordon as Gordon claimed to be Ms. Zuccala’s manager on the morning but later in the afternoon an email from certain Mr. Wilkinson was sent to me claiming him to be Ms. Zuccala’s manager informing me to discuss issues against Ms. Zuccala with him. These collaborative actions by Ms. Gordon and Mr. Wilkinson confused me and both did not exert effort to resolve my complaint against Ms. Zuccala. Again, this is a clear display of you having tolerated both Gordon’s and Wilkinson’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 7 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on my complaint against Ms. Debbie Zuccala as profoundly shown on certified mail dated March 12, 2013 titled REQUEST FOR RESPONSE to the OFFICE OF OPERATOR CERTIFICATION. Again, this is a clear display of you having tolerated Zuccala’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
INFO 5.
D. AGGRAVATING MANIFESTATION OF INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION AND CONTINUING INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS THROUGH DELIBERATE AND WILLFUL AND INTENTIONAL AND REPEATED MULTIPLE TIMES WITH IMPUNITY, MERCILESSLY CONTINUING FAILURE TO SHOW OR INSTITUTE CORRECTIVE MANAGERIAL ACTION BY HOWARD IN THE FOLLOWING OCCASIONS:
ACTIONS TAKEN VS. ANDREW COOPER ?
COUNT 34 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 19 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from July 3, 2017 to July 28, 2017).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY
COUNT 43 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from April 2, 2018 to April 30, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY
COUNT 44 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 21 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from May 2, 2018 to May 30, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY
COUNT 46 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from July 2, 2018 to July 30, 2018).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY
COUNT 54 : Failure to respond or acknowledge receipt of record of emails requesting and appealing from you “to write me your decision whether to grant or deny me the minimum 6 educational point requirement for Grade 1 WWTP operator examination after thorough evaluation of my BS Management Engineering educational credentials among others, as professionally evaluated for you by ERES ” despite of 20 email follow ups with subject: HOWARD_CONTINUING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROBING DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS BY SWRCB AGAINST MY PERSON ( from March 1, 2019 to March 28, 2019).
INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY
INFO 4.
C. FAILURE TO SHOW OR INSTITUTE CORRECTIVE MANAGERIAL ACTION BY HOWARD
(7 counts)
COUNT 1 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. James Maughan regarding the latter’s commission of usurpation of authority by responding on date 12 March 2015 to the email with subject : TWO LINKS for Title 23 Waters addressed to you. This is a clear display of you having tolerated Maughan’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 2 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. Andrew Cooper regarding the latter’s commission of usurpation of authority when he responded without having been authorized to the letter intended for you dated 21 May 2013 on April 9, 2015. This is a clear display of you having tolerated Cooper’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 3 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. Andrew Cooper regarding the latter’s commission of dishonesty when Cooper withheld the information about my educational credentials dated 13 April 2015 among others, when I inquired about this document from him. Again, this is a clear display of you having tolerated Cooper’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 4 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. James Maughan regarding the latter’s commission of usurpation of authority on 4 May 2015 when he responded to the letter dated May 21, 2013 where Maughan acknowledged, this letter was not addressed to him but to the State Water Resources Control Board Agency Administrator. Again, this is a clear display of you having tolerated Maughan’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 5 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. James Maughan on 22 May 2015 regarding the latter’s commission of cheating or dishonesty by informing me of sending original copy of my educational credentials but Maughan in fact sent me back just photocopies. Again, this is a clear display of you having tolerated Maughan’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 6 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on Mr. Wes Wilkinson and Ms. Christine regarding their collaborative effort to confuse me to drive culpability away from Ms. Debbie Zuccala who claimed to be both managers of Ms. Debbie Zuccala on September 24, 2012 which confused me on who between them to talk to. I have already discussed my complaint against Ms. Zuccala earlier with Ms. Gordon as Gordon claimed to be Ms. Zuccala’s manager on the morning but later in the afternoon an email from certain Mr. Wilkinson was sent to me claiming him to be Ms. Zuccala’s manager informing me to discuss issues against Ms. Zuccala with him. These collaborative actions by Ms. Gordon and Mr. Wilkinson confused me and both did not exert effort to resolve my complaint against Ms. Zuccala. Again, this is a clear display of you having tolerated both Gordon’s and Wilkinson’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
COUNT 7 : Failure to show or institute corrective managerial action on my complaint against Ms. Debbie Zuccala as profoundly shown on certified mail dated March 12, 2013 titled REQUEST FOR RESPONSE to the OFFICE OF OPERATOR CERTIFICATION. Again, this is a clear display of you having tolerated Zuccala’s illicit conduct in support of your agency’s discriminatory action against my person.
TWENTY-EIGHT (28) COUNTS
FACTS DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED AND CONFORMED WITH SINCE THE DATES SHOWN
COUNT 1 Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Wednesday, July 17, 2019
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
REQUEST RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 2 Thursday, July 18, 2019
Thursday, July 18, 2019
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
REQUEST RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 3 Thursday, September 19, 2019
Thursday, September 19, 2019
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
HOWARD_DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 4 Monday, October 21, 2019
Monday, October 21, 2019
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
REITERATION OF DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 5 Thursday, November 21, 2019
Thursday, November 21, 2019
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES_REITERATION OF DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 6 Friday, December 20, 2019
Friday, December 20, 2019
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES_REITERATION OF DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 7 Friday January 31, 2020
Friday, January 31, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES_REITERATION OF DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 8 Friday, February 28, 2020
Friday, February 28, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES_REITERATION OF DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 9 Tuesday, March 31, 2020
Tuesday, March 31, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES_REITERATION OF DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 10 Thursday, April 30, 2020
Thursday, April 30, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES_REITERATION OF DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 11 Friday, May 29, 2020
Friday, May 29, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES_REITERATION OF DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 12 Tuesday, June 30, 2020
Tuesday, June 30, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES_REITERATION OF DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 13 Friday, July 31, 2020
Friday, July 31, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES_REITERATION OF DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 14 Monday, August 21, 2020
Monday, August 31, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES_REITERATION OF DEMAND RETURN OF ORIGINAL 'ERES' EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION DOCUMENTS AND THE $95 APPLICATION FEE
COUNT 15 Monday, October 5, 2020
Monday, October 5, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND/OR RESPOND TO EMAIL TITLED "INSTITUTIONALIZING DISCRIMINATION THROUGH MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY DATED OCTOBER 5. 2020
COUNT 16 Monday, October 5, 2020
Monday, October 5, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND /OR RESPOND, AS IN A SORT OF A PROMISE OF NO ADVERSE ACTION TO SHOW PROOF THAT MR. TOM HOWARD IS NOT DISSUADING MS DEBBIE ZUCCALA TO TESTIFY ON HER DIRECT PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXISTENCE OF THE ORIGINAL EDUCATIONAL RECORDS NOT EXACT COPIES OR PHOTOCOPIES I SUBMITTED TO HER OFFICE .
1. ZUCCALA ORIGINAL EDUCATIONAL RECORD EVALUATION DATED 5OCT20
2. ZUCCALA ORIGINAL EDUCATIONAL RECORD EVALUATION DATED 30OCT20
COUNT 17 Friday, November 27, 2020
Friday November 27, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND /OR RESPOND, AS IN A SORT OF A PROMISE OF NO ADVERSE ACTION TO SHOW PROOF THAT MR. TOM HOWARD IS NOT DISSUADING MS ANNA HERNANDEZ / ANNA PEREZ TO TESTIFY ON HER DIRECT PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXISTENCE OF THE ORIGINAL EDUCATIONAL RECORDS GIVEN THAT EXAMINED THE SAME SET OF DOCUMENTS AFTER MS. DEBBIE ZUCCALA.
COUNT 18 Tuesday, December 22, 2020
Tuesday December 22, 2020
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND /OR RESPOND, AS IN A SORT OF A MANAGERIAL ACTION TO SHOW PROOF THAT MR. TOM HOWARD, YOU ARE NOT DISSUADING MR. ANDREW COOPER TO TESTIFY ON HIS DIRECT PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXISTENCE OF THE ORIGINAL EDUCATIONAL RECORDS GIVEN THAT HE IS AS HE DECLARED THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OF HIS DEPARTMENT.
COUNT 19 Monday, January 4, 2020
Monday, January 4, 2021
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND /OR RESPOND, AS IN A SORT OF A PROOF THAT MR. TOM HOWARD, YOU ARE NOT TOLERATING IMPROPER CONDUCT BY MR. WES WILKINSON. YOUR INACTION TENDED TO SHOW UNABATED CONTINUING INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF DISCRIMINATION DEFYING ANY LEGAL DEFENSE VIA THE STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS.
COUNT 20 Wednesday, February 17, 2021
Wednesday, February 17, 2021
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND /OR RESPOND, AND TAKE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AS IN A SORT OF A MANAGERIAL CORRECTIVE ACTION AS PROOF THAT MR. TOM HOWARD, YOU ARE NOT CONSPIRING WITH MR. WES WILKINSON AS TO LATTER'S COMMISSION OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF S40 FROM MY OPERATOR CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FEE AND $55 THEFT OF THE REFUND PORTION OF THAT PARTICULAR FEE.
COUNT 21 Monday March 8, 2021
Monday, March 8, 2021
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND /OR RESPOND, AS IN A SORT OF A MANAGERIAL CORRECTIVE ACTION AS PROOF THAT MR. TOM HOWARD, ET AL , YOU ARE NOT CONSPIRING WITH MR. WES WILKINSON AS TO LATTER'S COMMISSION OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF S40 FROM MY OPERATOR CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FEE AND $55 THEFT OF THE REFUND PORTION OF THAT PARTICULAR FEE.
COUNT 22 Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND /OR RESPOND, AS IN A SORT OF A MANAGERIAL CORRECTIVE ACTION AS PROOF THAT MR. TOM HOWARD, ET AL , YOU ALL ARE NOT CONSPIRING WITH MR. JAMES MAUGHAN AS TO LATTER'S REFUSAL TO PROVIDE NAME/NAMES OF HIS STAFF WHO INFORMED HIM ABOUT THE "ORIGINAL" ERES EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS I SUBMITTED TO HIS OFFICE.
COUNT 23 Friday April 30, 2021
Friday, April 30, 2021
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND /OR RESPOND, AND/OR QUIT THEIR COLLECTIVE IMPROPER CONDUCT AS IN A SORT OF A MANAGERIAL CORRECTIVE ACTION AS PROOF THAT MR. TOM HOWARD, ET AL , YOU ALL ARE NOT CONSPIRING WITH MR. JAMES MAUGHAN AS TO LATTER'S REFUSAL TO PROVIDE NAME/NAMES OF HIS STAFF WHO INFORMED HIM ABOUT THE "ORIGINAL" ERES EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS I SUBMITTED TO HIS OFFICE TO PERPETUATE ILLUSIVE RESOLUTION TO THE WITHHELD "ORIGINAL" EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS.
COUNT 24 Tuesday, June 29, 2021
Tuesday, June 29, 2021
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL AND DELIBERATE REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INFORMATION BY PIO EDWARD ORTIZ WHETHER YOU, MR. TOM HOWARD , ET AL ARE STILL EMPLOYED BY CWRCB AND IGNORED REQUEST FOR MS. PAM BIGGINS TO UNBLOCK MY EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS WITH HER. LIKEWISE, HIS REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INFORMATION AS TO WHO WERE THE APPROPRIATE REPRESENTATIVES WHOM HE FORWARDED MY EMAILS TO.
COUNT 25 Friday, July 16, 2021
Friday, July 16, 2021
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL AND DELIBERATE REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INFORMATION BY PIO AILEEN VOISIN SIMILAR TO PIO EDWARD ORTIZ DID WHETHER YOU, MR. TOM HOWARD , ET AL ARE STILL EMPLOYED BY CWRCB AND IGNORED REQUEST FOR MS. PAM BIGGINS TO UNBLOCK MY EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS WITH HER. LIKEWISE, HER REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INFORMATION AS TO WHO WERE THE APPROPRIATE REPRESENTATIVES WHOM MIGHT HAVE FORWARDED MY EMAILS TO SIMILAR TO QUESTIONS RAISED WHICH PIO EDWARD ORTIZ REFUSED TO ANSWER.
COUNT 26 Tuesday, August 3, 2021
Tuesday, August 3, 2021
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL AND DELIBERATE REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INFORMATION BY PIO BLAIR ROBERTSON SIMILAR TO PIO EDWARD ORTIZ DID WHETHER YOU, MR. TOM HOWARD , ET AL ARE STILL EMPLOYED BY CWRCB AND IGNORED REQUEST FOR MS. PAM BIGGINS TO UNBLOCK MY EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS WITH HER. LIKEWISE, HER REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INFORMATION AS TO WHO WERE THE APPROPRIATE REPRESENTATIVES WHOM MIGHT HAVE FORWARDED MY EMAILS TO SIMILAR TO QUESTIONS RAISED WHICH PIO EDWARD ORTIZ REFUSED TO ANSWER.
COUNT 27 Thursday, August 5, 2021
Thursday, August 5, 2021
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL AND DELIBERATE REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INFORMATION BY OPA DIRECTOR JACKIE CARPENTER PIO SIMILAR TO PIO AILEEN VOISIN DID WHETHER YOU, MR. TOM HOWARD , ET AL ARE STILL EMPLOYED BY CWRCB AND IGNORED REQUEST FOR MS. PAM BIGGINS TO UNBLOCK MY EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS WITH HER. LIKEWISE, HER REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INFORMATION AS TO WHO WERE THE APPROPRIATE REPRESENTATIVES WHOM SHE, PIO AILEEN VOISIN, MIGHT HAVE FORWARDED MY EMAILS TO SIMILAR TO QUESTIONS RAISED WHICH PIO EDWARD ORTIZ REFUSED TO ANSWER.
COUNT 28 Tuesday, August 31, 2021
Tuesday, August 31, 2021
DEEMED ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL AND DELIBERATE REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INFORMATION BY MR. JONATHAN BISHOP SIMILAR TO OPA DIRECTOR JACKIE CARPENTER DID, WHETHER YOU, MR. TOM HOWARD , ET AL ARE STILL EMPLOYED BY CWRCB AND IGNORED REQUEST FOR MS. PAM BIGGINS TO UNBLOCK MY EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS WITH HER. LIKEWISE, HER REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INFORMATION AS TO WHO WERE THE APPROPRIATE REPRESENTATIVES WHOM SHE, PIO AILEEN VOISIN MIGHT HAVE FORWARDED MY EMAILS TO SIMILAR TO QUESTIONS RAISED WHICH PIO EDWARD ORTIZ REFUSED TO ANSWER.
END OF INFO 1 TO INFO 5 HERE.
So please Mr. Funston stop discriminating me, degrading me down to a pea brained Filipino that you would want me appear when you continually affirmed to rate me zero (0) on my ERES educational credentials from 2012 up to these days which in your mind I would not be able to interpret meanings behind the statements you are writing. May I most respectfully remind you that I am equally intelligent as you are.
This treatment born out of prejudice you all collectively have against me, a Filipino did not happen once but have been institutionalized by all of you and your agency and permeates all throughout my personal experience dealing with all of you through email communications, including regular and certified mails from 2012 up to the present from Ms. Debbie Zuccala up to you tattered with contemptuous disrespect, cheating, lies, false pretenses and deliberate negligence. Why? Because of myself being one born as a Filipino and educated in a school from the Philippines? The same primordial cause you did put a circular discriminatory mark around the word "PHILIPPINES" on the ERES educational document you are hiding since 2012 until now.
This led me to believe that this arbitrary and capricious decision and actions and omissions by the CSWRCB/OOC only show the intensity of discrimination all of you, collectively have against me, for being a Filipino and happened to be educated in a school from the PHILIPPINES.
Thank you very much.
Yours faithfully,
Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.
Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.
INFO 1 ENDS HERE
May I most humbly and respectfully write, that your CONTINUING DELIBERATE, INTENTIONAL, WILLFUL failure to provide a sincere letter of apology in my favor shall be understood by both of us that you, meaning the State Water Board, Ms. Sobeck, Mr. Funston and you all collectively, are outrageously encouraging these wrongful acts and omissions, cheating and misconducts to continue institutionalizing discrimination and continuing infliction of pain and suffering and emotional distress through collective managerial irresponsibility against my person.
Thank you very much.
Yours faithfully,
Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.
Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.
No comments:
Post a Comment