PROVIDE NAME/S OF YOUR STAFF

 from: antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>

to:"Maughan, James@Waterboards" <James.Maughan@waterboards.ca.gov>

cc:"Wilkinson, Wes@Waterboards" <Wes.Wilkinson@waterboards.ca.gov>,
Tom.Howard@waterboards.ca.gov,
thoward@waterboards.ca.gov,
Liz Haven <Liz.Haven@waterboards.ca.gov>,
Jonathan.Bishop@waterboards.ca.gov,
"Wilson, Doug@Waterboards" <Doug.Wilson@waterboards.ca.gov>,
Pam.Biggins@waterboards.ca.gov,
Toru.Okamoto@waterboards.ca.gov,
"Gordon, Christine@Waterboards" <Christine.Gordon@waterboards.ca.gov>,
kelly.valine@waterboards.ca.gov,
"Cooper, Andrew@Waterboards" <andrew.cooper@waterboards.ca.gov>,
"Zuccala, Debbie@Waterboards" <Debbie.Zuccala@waterboards.ca.gov>,
anna.hernandez@waterboards.ca.gov,
anna.perez@waterboards.ca.gov,
dzuccala@waterboards.ca.gov,
Antonio Buensuceso <shellresearchworks@gmail.com>
date:Mar 9, 2021, 7:05 AM

subject:PROVIDE NAME/S OF YOUR STAFF

mailed-by:gmail.com

Mr. James Maughan

Assistant Deputy Director

Division of Financial Assistance

Phone: 916-341-5694

Email: jmaughan@waterboards.ca.gov

Mail address:  1001 I Street, 16th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

SUBJECT : NAME/S OF YOUR STAFF WHO INFORMED YOU ABOUT THE EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL "ERES" EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS I SUBMITTED IN THE OCC 

Fact finding and information gathering being pursued by way of  an appeal under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552.

Dear Mr. James Maughan,

Good morning.

May I most respectfully and humbly refer you to ITEMS 1 TO 4 below which showed part of our long email communications record depicting events leading to this inquiry : NAME YOUR STAFF WHO INFORMED YOU ABOUT THE EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL  "ERES" EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS I SUBMITTED IN THE OOC.

May I most respectfully call your attention on ITEM 4, particularly:

"Friday, July 5, 2013

JULY 5, 2013 E-MAIL FROM MAUGHAN saying JUST exact same document NOT THE ORIGINAL

MAUGHAN E-MAIL dated July 5, 2013

Maughan, James@Waterboards  Jul 5 (1 day ago)        July 5, 2013

to me, jun.benefits 

Mr. Buensuceso, I am sorry it has taken this long to respond to you.  I have check with my staff and all I can say concerning the document that I sent you by certified mail; it is the same exact document that you sent us.  You will notice that there is as “State Water Resources Control Board” Date stamp dated July 19, 2012 on the document.  We have sent back to you exactly what you sent to us.  "

specifically :

" I have check with my staff and all I can say concerning the document that I sent you by certified mail; it is the same exact document that you sent us.  " 

With these premises comprehensively and clearly presented to you, may you please provide me with the name/s of your staff who informed you about the exact copy of my original "ERES" EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS  I submitted to  OOC ?

Thank you so much.

Yours faithfully,

Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.

                 

ITEMS 1 TO 4 REFERRED TO ABOVE:

1.

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		"Maughan, James@Waterboards" <James.Maughan@waterboards.ca.gov>
cc:		antonio buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>, shellresearchworks@gmail.com
date:		Jun 26, 2013, 5:29 AM
subject:		EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS
mailed-by:		gmail.com

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

JUNE 26, 2013 E-MAIL FOR JAMES MAUGHAN A COMPLAINT THAT HE MAKES A FOOL OF ME AGAIN

June 26,  2013

Mr. James Maughan

Assistant Deputy Director

Division of Financial Assistance

Phone: 916-341-5694

Email: jmaughan@waterboards.ca.gov

Mail address:  1001 I Street, 16th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

SUBJECT : TWO PERSONS CLAIMING TO BE Ms. Debbie Zuccala's

                 MANAGER.... VERY CONFUSING

                 Fact finding and information gathering being pursued by way of 

                 an appeal under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552. 

Dear Mr. James Maughan,

Good morning.

May I, respectfully and with utmost humility, inform you that you are committing extreme mockery against 

my person  by doing  acts I am not requesting you to do, and ignore those which I need you to be doing.

I  attached my educational credentials on my e-mail dated June 25. 2013 as a proof of the Bachelor of 

Science in Management Engineering educational credentials which  is similar to the credentials you have 

in your file.This educational credentials had already been examined first  by  Ms. Debbie Zuccala and  then, 

by certain    Ms. Anna Hernandez and she, the latter,  had already determined that the mentioned educational credentials  did not merit the six(6) educational point requirement to be qualified to take the Grade 1  operator certification examination.. I categorically opposed her findings and steadfastly requested that the application 

form and the educational credentials covering the Bachelor of Science in  Management Engineering in forms attested by ERES (Educational Records Evaluation Service, Sacramento, CA) be send back to me with comments or annotations why it could not merit a six (6) educational points so that I might be able to seek a third party opinion about the matter. However,  Ms. Debbie Zuccala, Ms. Anna Hernandez, Mr. Wes Wilkinson, Ms. Christine Gordon and the Office of Operator Certification willfully ignored my request And, just recently,     Mr. Andrew Cooper withheld  showing  or sending me back my educational credentials.

Now, you are  informing me that your staff have reviewed the information as regarding my educational 

credentials as  shown part of  your e-mail, where you wrote : (from the e-mail shown below)

"Concerning your educational credentials, staff have reviewed the information that you just sent 
and just need the transcripts for the Management Engineering – Bachelor of Science Degree so 
that we can give you all the credit that you deserve.  Please send that as soon as you can."  

This is ridiculous and appalling. I am  not requesting for  the credit that you can give. What matter to me most is your act of returning back to me copies of my educational credentials(original) with signatures of  
Ms. Anna Hernandez and Mr. Wes Wilkinson, to show that both of them have prudently and conscientiously  examined it and determined that it could worth not even half an educational point. Please send it ( original 
copies of ERES evaluated educational credentials on your file) back to me as soon as you can. Please
charge postage cost against my  $95 check payment.

May I be allowed to present other concerns, a number of them, including those with Ms. Debbie Zuccala, et al  on my next e-mails.

Thank you very much.

Yours faithfully,

Antonio L. Buensuceso

from:		Maughan, James@Waterboards <James.Maughan@waterboards.ca.gov>
to:		"antonio jr. Buensuceso" <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
cc:		"shellresearchworks@gmail.com" <shellresearchworks@gmail.com>
date:		Jun 25, 2013, 8:53 AM
subject:		RE: CONTINUING FACT FINDING REQUEST
mailed-by:		waterboards.ca.gov

Maughan, James@Waterboards
to me, shellresearchw.

Mr. Buensuceso,

Again I am sorry for any confusion I have caused you.  I do know that Tom Howard would like you to communicate with me first.  To help clear up who works for who.  I have attached a partial Division of Financial Assistance Organization Chart.  It show our Administration Section and show who supervisors whom.  I have highlighted Wes Wilkinson,  Christine Gordon,  Debbie Zuccala and Andrew Cooper.  You will see that Ms. Zuccala reports to Mr. Wilkerson who reports to Ms. Gordon.

You will notice that they all directly or indirectly report to me.

I hope this helps clear up some of your concerns.

Concerning your educational credentials, staff have reviewed the information that you just sent and just need the transcripts for the Management Engineering – Bachelor of Science Degree so that we can give you all the credit that you deserve.  Please send that as soon as you can.

Thanks you

James Maughan

Assistant Deputy Director,  Division of Financial Assistance

916-341-5694

jmaughan@waterboards.ca.gov

2.

from: antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>

to:"Maughan, James@Waterboards" <James.Maughan@waterboards.ca.gov>
date:Jun 26, 2013, 2:50 PM

subject:Re: EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS

mailed-by:gmail.com

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

JUNE 26, 2013, E-MAIL FROM JAMES MAUGHAN INFORMING ME THAT HE'S SENDING BACK ORIGINALS OF MY EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS

Maughan, James@Waterboards <James.Maughan@waterboards.ca.gov>    Jun 26
to me, shellresearchw.

Mr. Buensuceso, I am placing in the mail (certified mail) today back to you: originals of your educational credentials as you requested. I have sent them to:

Antonio L. Buensuceso

12901 Francine Terrace

Poway, CA 92064

I have included the letter we sent you evaluating your application that you do not meet the education requirements because we you have not submitted transcripts of the classes that you took to obtain Bachelor of Science Degree.  We require all applicants to submit transcripts for classes taken.

James Maughan

Assistant Deputy Director,  Division of Financial Assistance

916-341-5694

jmaughan@waterboards.ca.gov     

3.

Monday, July 1, 2013

JULY 1, 2013 E-MAIL FOR JAMES MAUGHAN CONTINUES MAKING FUN OF ME

July 1, 2013

Dear Mr. James Maughan,

I am sending my e-mail dated  June 26, 2013 to protest  the following :

1) The educational credentials that you sent through the certified mail shown  below
    are not the original copies that I submitted to Ms. Debbie Zuccala. Those are
    mere photo copies. I have requested for the original copies of my Bachelor
    of Science in Management Engineering educational credentials as evaluated by
    ERES but you just sent photocopies .

2)You did not have Mr. Wes Wilkinson  and Certain Ms. Anna Hernandez to sign
    on that document to show proof that they have conscientiously  and prudently
    examined my educational credentials and they have determined that this particular
    educational credentials which has been evaluated by ERES could not merit
    the six(6) point requirement for Grade 1 operator certification examination and
    you did not state your grounds why this particular  request for their signatures
    could not be  granted.

3) I reiterate  my concerns as expressed on my e-mail dated June 26, 2013 below.

June 26,  2013

Mr. James Maughan

Assistant Deputy Director

Division of Financial Assistance

Phone: 916-341-5694

Email: jmaughan@waterboards.ca.gov

Mail address:  1001 I Street, 16th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

SUBJECT : TWO PERSONS CLAIMING TO BE Ms. Debbie Zuccala's

                 MANAGER.... VERY CONFUSING

                 Fact finding and information gathering being pursued by way of 

                 an appeal under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552. 

Dear Mr. James Maughan,

Good morning.

May I, respectfully and with utmost humility, inform you that you are committing extreme mockery against 

my person  by doing  acts I am not requesting you to do, and ignore those which I need you to be doing.

I  attached my educational credentials on my e-mail dated June 25. 2013 as a proof of the Bachelor of 

Science in Management Engineering educational credentials which  is similar to the credentials you have 

in your file.This educational credentials had already been examined first  by  Ms. Debbie Zuccala and  then, 

by certain    Ms. Anna Hernandez and she, the latter,  had already determined that the mentioned educational credentials  did not merit the six(6) educational point requirement to be qualified to take the Grade 1  operator certification examination.. I categorically opposed her findings and steadfastly requested that the application 

form and the educational credentials covering the Bachelor of Science in  Management Engineering in forms attested by ERES (Educational Records Evaluation Service, Sacramento, CA) be send back to me with comments or annotations why it could not merit a six (6) educational points so that I might be able to seek a third party opinion about the matter. However,  Ms. Debbie Zuccala, Ms. Anna Hernandez, Mr. Wes Wilkinson, Ms. Christine Gordon and the Office of Operator Certification willfully ignored my request And, just recently,     Mr. Andrew Cooper withheld  showing  or sending me back my educational credentials.

Now, you are  informing me that your staff have reviewed the information as regarding my educational 

credentials as  shown part of  your e-mail, where you wrote : (from the e-mail shown below)

"Concerning your educational credentials, staff have reviewed the information that you just sent 
and just need the transcripts for the Management Engineering – Bachelor of Science Degree so 
that we can give you all the credit that you deserve.  Please send that as soon as you can."  

This is ridiculous and appalling. I am  not requesting for  the credit that you can give. What matter to me most is your act of returning back to me copies of my educational credentials(original) with signatures of  
Ms. Anna Hernandez and Mr. Wes Wilkinson, to show that both of them have prudently and conscientiously  examined it and determined that it could worth not even half an educational point. Please send it ( original 
copies of ERES evaluated educational credentials on your file) back to me as soon as you can. Please
charge postage cost against my  $95 check payment.

May I be allowed to present other concerns, a number of them, including those with Ms. Debbie Zuccala, et al  on my next e-mails.

Thank you very much.

Yours faithfully,

Antonio L. Buensuceso

I clipped with this e-mail some relevant images for your appreciation.

Sincerely,

Antonio L. Buensuceso


























         CERTIFIED MAIL ENVELOPE




          MAUGHAN WROTE ME THAT HE HAD SEND ME
          ORIGINALS VIA CERTIFIED MAIL ON JUNE 26, 2013.
          THESE ARE MERE PHOTOCOPIES THE EDUCATIONAL
          CREDENTIALS  THAT MR. MAUGHAN  SENT, WHILE
          I AM REQUESTING FOR THE ORIGINAL COPIES THAT
          I SENT TOGETHER WITH MY APPLICATION.

  PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS  

PAGE 2  EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS  BY  ERES

PAGE 3  EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS BY ERES

4.

Friday, July 5, 2013

JULY 5, 2013 E-MAIL FROM MAUGHAN saying JUST exact same document NOT THE ORIGINAL

MAUGHAN E-MAIL dated July 5, 2013

Maughan, James@Waterboards  Jul 5 (1 day ago)        July 5, 2013

to me, jun.benefits 

Mr. Buensuceso, I am sorry it has taken this long to respond to you.  I have check with my staff and all I can say concerning the document that I sent you by certified mail; it is the same exact document that you sent us.  You will notice that there is as “State Water Resources Control Board” Date stamp dated July 19, 2012 on the document.  We have sent back to you exactly what you sent to us.

 I and my staff have reviewed all the documents that you have sent us.  We do not dispute the validity of any of the documents.  We do not question the ERES documents and what they state, the document just lack the detail we need to account for the proper number of education points.  Therefore, we have asked for several times and continue to request that you supply us with specific classes that you have taken (usually supplied by transcripts), so that we can account for the proper education points.

Mr. Buensuceso, at this point I think I have responded to all your questions.  It is up to you how you would like to proceed with your application.  I hope that if you still want to apply to take the test that you will supply us with your transcripts.  I wish you the best in whatever you decide to do from this point further.

 James Maughan

Assistant Deputy Director,  Division of Financial Assistance

916-341-5694

jmaughan@waterboards.ca.gov

JULY 30, 2015 22ND E-MAIL SINCE JULY 1, 2015 FOR TOM HOWARD RE TORTIOUS ORDEAL DEALING WITH JAMES MAUGHAN

TENTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL LOSING TIME TO ACT I am sending this letter to you today June 28, 2014 as a matter of TENTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite NINE (9) PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response from you.  Read more » NINTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL MOVE TO THE RIGHT TRUNK I am sending this letter to you today May 28, 2014 as a matter of  NINTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite EIGHTH (8) PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response from you.  Please grab this ninth chance to redeem yourself. Think it over, sooner or later, someone will be blowing the whistle to free himself/herself out of this controversy. Move to the right trunk before having a bad fall. Read more » 8TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL, SPILL THE BEANS I am sending this letter to you today May 11, 2014 as a matter of EIGHTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite SEVEN (7) PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response from you.  Please grab the eighth chance to redeem yourself. Think it over, sooner or later, someone will be blowing the whistle to free himself/herself out of this controversy.  Spill the beans before it is too late. Read more » SEVENTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL, NOWHERE TO RUN I am sending this letter to you today April 20, 2014 as a matter of SEVENTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite SIX (6) PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response from you.  Please grab the seventh chance to redeem yourself. Think it over, sooner or later, someone will be blowing the whistle to free herself out of this controversy. Read more » SIXTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL, GRAB THE VINE I am sending this letter to you today March 30, 2014 as a matter of  SIXTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite FIVE (5) PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response you.  Please grab the sixth chance to redeem yourself. Read more » FIFTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL FOR MR. JAMES MAUGHAN  I am sending this letter to you today March 15, 2014 as a matter of FIFTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite four (4) PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response from you.   Read more » FOURTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL FOR MR. JAMES MAUGHAN I am sending this letter to you today March 2, 2014 as a matter of FOURTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite three PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response you. Read more » PERSUASIVE APPEAL THIRD IN A ROW I am sending this letter today, February 23, 2014, to respectfully remind you that I have not received any response from you since I sent you the PERSUASIVE APPEAL dated Thursday, January 30, 2014.  Likewise,  I send the same letter on Sunday,  February 16,  2014.   I did not receive any response from you on those two instances.  These facts led me to believe that you,  like your employees namely, Ms Debbie Zuccala and Mr Andrew Cooper, fled after being proven to be at fault to avoid culpability. Then,  someone else would just butt in without being endorsed and meddle with the issues and complicate the matter even worse. Read more » PERSUASIVE APPEAL FOLLOW UP Dear Mr. James Maughan,I am sending this letter today February 16, 2014 to respectfully remind you that I have not  received any response from you since I sent you the PERSUASIVE APPEAL dated Thursday, January 30, 2014. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso Read more » PERSUASIVE APPEAL DATED JANUARY 30, 2014 January 30, 2014 Mr. James Maughan Assistant Deputy Director Division of Financial Assistance Phone: 916-341-5694 Email: jmaughan@waterboards.ca.gov Mail address:  1001 I Street, 16th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814  SUBJECT :  Continuing demand for the return of  the original educational credentials                        as evaluated by ERES and comments why  a circle mark was wrap around                      the word  "PHILIPPINES" as shown in the returned exact copy (photocopy)                        of my original educational credentials. Copy of the credential with discriminatory circular mark around the word "PHILIPPINES". Dear Mr. James Maughan, Good morning. From your e-mail dated December 30, 2013 as an alibi for denying the minimum six (6) educational points for Grade 1 operator certification examination you wrote the following: "Concerning the request for educational transcripts from you, this is a request that we make to all applicants and all comply with this request in order to take the exam.  It is the only way we can make a determination of educational credits that can be awarded to the applicant. Section 3700(a)(3)- of the operator certification regulations states “ a copy of a high school diploma or equivalent; college transcripts; graduate school transcripts; report cards; certificates of completion for wastewater treatment and management courses; and chemical, civil, or mechanical engineering registrations issued by California or another state, a territory, or Indian tribe, to verify completion of educations requirements.” (This except is found on page 32 of the regulations).  Here is the link to the regulations: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/operator_certification/docs/ocr_clean.pdf " Please be informed that these regulations are effective just last April 1, 2013  as shown by the information shown below.  For your appreciation,  click "Final Text of Regulations". These regulations are not yet effective on September 6, 2012. There is no sense applying  regulations promulgated on April 1, 2013 for applications filed on July 24, 2012. FROM THE WATERBOARDS OPERATOR CERTIFICATION WEB PAGE Announcements The State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) has revised its regulations in chapter 26 of division 3 of title 23 of the California Code of Regulations, regarding wastewater treatment plant classification, operator certification, and contractor registration for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Certification Program. The regulations are effective April 1, 2013. Please see: Final Text of Regulations Underline/Strikeout Version of Regulations Operator Certification Rulemaking Package Fact Sheet/New Regulations (posted 4/23/13) May I reiterate in unequivocal terms that I  have sent the "original" copy of my educational credentials covering the Bachelor of Science in Management Engineering as evaluated by ERES, Sacramento, CA, together with my application for operator certification and the check payment of $95. This set of application documents was prepared by me  then received by Ms. Debbie Zuccala.  Hence, may I most respectfully remind you that your statement on your e-mail below,  to wit: " If this document was not the "original" then the only thing I can conclude is  that you never  sent the "original" to us but a copy." ,  is outrageous, baseless  and irresponsible.  As a matter of fact,  Ms Debbie Zuccala had not denied the  existence of the "original" ERES  educational credentials since  September 6, 2012 up to the present times.  Ms Christine Gordon,   Mr. Wes Wilkinson and Ms Anna Hernandez,  all did not deny the existence  of  the "original" copy of my educational credentials as evaluated by ERES.  Therefore,  you can not belatedly claim otherwise,  during these times, after you have been caught  cheating and lying about it. Since,  September 6, 2012,  on my letter, last paragraph  I have requested and  demanded that the original copy of my educational credentials covering the  Bachelor of Science in Management Engineering as evaluated by ERES (Educational Records Evaluation Service, Sacramento, Ca)  be returned  to me with signature of Ms Anna Hernandez initially,  which later, since  Mr  Wes Wilkinson and you have checked it as well,  I requested that  Mr Wes Wilkinson and you signed it  just the same.  I wanted to categorically  state that you have not send me  yet the original copy of my educational  credentials.  With regard to this issue,  it is worthwhile to inform you that  Ms Debbie Zuccala willfully refused to reply,  Ms  Anna Hernandez  failed to  respond, Mr Wes Wilkinson ignored to reply, the Office of Operator Certification ignored to reply, then Mr Andrew Cooper withheld the information about this ERES educational credentials, then ran away and hide,  then now you are telling me that you have sent all the original copy and you have nothing else to return. With all due respect,  you are cheating. Since,  September 6, 2012,  I have drawn the line. I did not and will not send in  any  additional educational records.  I do not intend to seek the complete or  over all  educational  points that the Bachelor of Science in Management  Engineering could make.  I just needed the minimum six(6) educational points for Grade 1 operator certification examination. I repeat just six(6) educational points. It does not make sense that you still needed to analyze transcript of records from  schools and universities from the Philippines to come up to conclusion that  I have met the required minimum six(6) educational point for  Grade 1 WWTP operator certification examination. The evaluation of the transcript of records for this  mentioned educational credentials have been well taken cared of by  ERES for you.  Besides, as my record and experience with your staff is to be  considered, with all due respect, they are incompetent and irresponsible and  cunning.  At most, as I saw it, they would not know  how to evaluate transcript  of records from foreign countries as evidenced by their deeds,  as exemplified  on the next paragraphs and therefore letting your staff and you, analyze transcript  of records  from the Philippines is deemed to be  a useless and futile  exercise  being already been professionally taken cared of  for you by ERES. See for yourself, again with all due respect,  Ms Debbie Zuccala,  considered my WWTP Operator Certification application for an application  for WWTP  Operator-in-Training Certification. These application forms are  distinctly different from each other and when asked  why,  she refused to reply.  The code of regulation said, that  applications not in the correct forms shall be  considered deficient and deficient applications shall not be processed but  Ms Debbie Zuccala still processed my application and charged me S95 though it  is not in the correct form and therefore, deficient, and should not been processed,  and I should have saved my $95. This proves Ms Debbie Zuccala's incompetence.  That same application, though has already been found as an application for  WWTP operator certification and not correct application for WWTP  certification examination,  but  still Ms Anna Hernandez process it, and charged me $40 though it was deficient. A violation of your own regulation done not once,  but twice with express approval of Mr. Wes Wilkinson. This showed Mr. Wes Wilkinson and Ms Anna Hernandez collective incompetence. Second, Mr Wes Wilkinson and Ms Christine Gordon in conspiracy, both send me  an e-mail on September 24, 2012 claiming each one of them is Ms Debbie  Zuccala's manager with covert intention to confuse me and drive away culpability  from Ms. Debbie Zuccala. Though they might be both managers for Ms Debbie  Zuccala, prudence and courtesy and good judgment dictate that it would  be very confusing for me to talk to two managers for the same person at the same  time, especially so, when these two managers are avoiding accountability  for Ms Debbie Zuccala deeds and/or omissions. Consequently, they have  completely confused me. This proves that Ms Christine Gordon and Mr Wes Wilkinson are cunning. Third, Mr. Andrew Cooper, declared himself as the Freedom of Information Officer,  then, withheld the information about the now controversial "ERES educational credentials" and when informed that he was replying to a letter not addressed to  him and told that his act consisted "usurpation of authority," now,  he is gone into  hiding. This shows Mr Andrew Cooper gross misrepresentation and dishonesty. Fourth, as to the person who opened the the letter addressed to the Agency  Administrator of the California Water Resources Control Board as my records showed the suspects might be  from Mr. Andrew Cooper, then,  Mr. Wes Wilkinson and then you, Mr. James Maughan.  As you already knew,  that letter was addressed  to  Mr. Tim Howard,  being the Agency Administrator  and not to you. With all due  respect, with your deeds and/or omissions, which  plunged me into deeper pain and misery, you became  (pardon me for this word) a   shame  to the office of  Mr. Tim Howard which you are trying to represent.  This is gross misrepresentation,  cheating and dishonesty. Fifth, with your continuing reluctance to return to me original copy of my  educational credentials  as evaluated by ERES (Educational Records Evaluation  Service, Sacramento, Ca) together with your signature and rest of signatures of Ms Anna Hernandez and Mr. Wes Wilkinson,  you have effectively deny me of the  chance to show that pieces of original document to a neutral third party and to  seek their corresponding opinion or advice about this matter, and consequently if warranted,  file appropriate administrative or civil or criminal charges against Ms Anna Hernandez,  Mr Wes Wilkinson and you,  Mr  James Maughan. This is suppression of evidential documents, deceit and dishonesty. Again,  I wanted to reiterate that if Ms Anna Hernandez,  and  Mr. Wes Wilkinson  and you, most respectfully,  Mr. Maughan strongly believe that you are right on  denying the minimum six(6) educational point requirement on my educational  credentials that is with you right now,  (no transcript of records)  for a Grade 1  WWTP operator certification examination,  then,  please do not hide it,  and put  your signatures on it with pride and great honor to show the public that you have  done the right thing.  Otherwise,  you have done something ridiculous and shameful. Please send me back the original educational records covering the Bachelor of  Science in Management Engineering as evaluated by ERES with your signatures as soon as you can.  Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

The TRUTH will set you FREE.