WWTP CERTIFICATION REVIEW: REFUND THEFT MISAPPROPRIATION AND CONCEALING OF EVIDENTIARY DOCUMENT DATED 14MAR21

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com
to:		"Wilkinson, Wes@Waterboards" <Wes.Wilkinson@waterboards.ca.gov>, "Doug@Waterboards" <Doug.Wilson@waterboards.ca.gov>, kelly.valine@waterboards.ca.gov, Tom.Howard@waterboards.ca.gov, thoward@waterboards.ca.gov, "Gordon, Christine@Waterboards" <Christine.Gordon@waterboards.ca.gov>, "Zuccala, Debbie@Waterboards" <Debbie.Zuccala@waterboards.ca.gov>, Liz Haven <Liz.Haven@waterboards.ca.gov>, Jonathan.Bishop@waterboards.ca.gov, Pam.Biggins@waterboards.ca.gov, "Maughan, James@Waterboards" <James.Maughan@waterboards.ca.gov>, Toru.Okamoto@waterboards.ca.gov, "Cooper, Andrew@Waterboards" <andrew.cooper@waterboards.ca.gov>, anna.hernandez@waterboards.ca.gov, anna.perez@waterboards.ca.gov, dzuccala@waterboards.ca.gov, Antonio Buensuceso <shellresearchworks@gmail.com>
date:		Mar 14, 2021, 10:24 AM
subject:		REFUND THEFT MISAPPROPRIATION AND CONCEALING OF EVIDENTIARY DOCUMENT DATED 14MAR21
mailed-by:		gmail.com

March 14, 2021

Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.

10620 Caminito Derecho

San Diego, CA 92126
antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com

ALL:

Tom.Howard@waterboards.ca.gov,
thoward@waterboards.ca.gov
Liz Haven <Liz.Haven@waterboards.ca.gov>,
Jonathan.Bishop@waterboards.ca.gov,
"Maughan, James@Waterboards" <James.Maughan@waterboards.ca.gov>,
"Gordon, Christine@Waterboards" <Christine.Gordon@waterboards.ca.gov>,
Toru.Okamoto@waterboards.ca.gov,
Pam.Biggins@waterboards.ca.gov,
"Wilson, Doug@Waterboards" <Doug.Wilson@waterboards.ca.gov>,
kelly.valine@waterboards.ca.gov,
John.Russell@waterboard.ca.gov
"Andrew@Waterboards<andrew.cooper@waterboards.ca.gov.>
anna.hernandez@waterboards.ca.gov,"Zuccala,Debbie@Waterboards" <Debbie.Zuccala@waterboards.ca.gov>,dzuccala@waterboards.ca.gov,
anna.perez@waterboards.ca.gov

SUBJECT : $55 REFUND THEFT AND $40 MISAPPROPRIATION OF MY CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FEE AND CONCEALING EVIDENTIARY DOCUMENT BY WILKINSON ARE ACTS LIKEWISE BY THE CSWRCB AND BY ALL OF YOU WHO ARE CONSPIRING WITH HIM

Dear Mr. Wes Wilkinson and ALL:

This evidence, among others which I have discussed, why you, Mr. Wilkinson and ALL, most probably agreed, consented and conspired with one another and let Mr. Wilkinson wrote and prepared the certified mail dated 18 February 2014, items 2 and 3 below, signed by Mr. Howard, The Executive Director, CSWRCB, EXPRESSLY CONSENTING TO IT, where the letter envelope, shown in item 1 below came from your office, the Division of Financial Assistance and not from the Office of the Executive Director.

Anyway, on account of item 4 below where you wrote :

"Please note that you currently have a credit of $55 on file with the OCC. If you would like a refund of the $55, please send a refund request to: " YOU, Mr. Wilkinson,

"If you do not request a refund, your credit of $55 will remain with the OCC."

I had requested and demanded that the amount $55 credit be refunded to me as soon as possible without prejudice to the full amount of $95 full refund of my operator certification application fee, see item 5 below, which I am steadfastly demanding from you. Meaning that the remaining $40 of my operator certification fee which you misappropriated shall be a subject of my inquiry under the freedom of information act.

In law, misappropriation may be defined as "[t]he unauthorized, improper, or unlawful use of funds or other property for purposes other than that for which it is intended." You might have committed misappropriation and maybe liable to criminal prosecution for a form of theft as well as disciplinary action. See Item 5 .

Please consider these facts of the crimes committed:

Ownership.

I am the victim of the crime and I have the "possessory interest" in the $55 refund and the $40 misappropriated operator certification fee.

Wrongful taking.

I have not given consent to the taking of the $55 refund instead I am demanding the return of that amount to me and the $40 examination fee, since I did not formally file the application for examination as evidenced by the form I filled up up, once only, was for a certification (see Item 5 ) and not for examination.

Carried away. The CWCRB and you, Mr. Wilkinson, and co-conspirators had taken away those amounts from me.

Intent to permanently deprive. The CWCRB and you, Mr. Wilkinson, together with the co-conspirators had intended to permanently deprive me of my money.

Please Mr. Howard, Ms. Haven, Mr. Bishop, Mr. Maughan, Ms. Gordon, Mr. Cooper, Ms. Hernandez/Perez, Ms. Zuccala, Mr. Okamoto, Ms. Biggins, Mr. Wilson and Ms. Valine, write to me why you should not be indicted on the charge of conspiracy to commit the alleged crimes. Failure to write to me your opposition to those assailed acts by CSWRCB and Mr. Wilkinson shall be understood that you are and shall remain consenting and conspiring with them.

May I most respectfully request you All, please write to me individually your withdrawal from the conspiracy as soon as you can or you may lose your chance if you withdraw from it later. However, by virtue of the information I reviewed (See ITEM 6 below JUNE 25, 2013 EMAIL FROM JAMES MAUGHAN SHOWING EMPLOYEE DESIGNATIONS ANSWERING AT LAST WHO IS THE LEGALLY MANDATED MANAGER OF DEBBIE ZUCCALA AFTER TORTIOUS ORDEAL OF 8 MONTHS),

I determined from the diagram that Ms. Zuccala, Ms. Hernandez/Ms. Perez and Mr. Cooper must not be included to be charged in the theft and misappropriation of criminal conspiracy complaint. Why? Because they, being subordinates to these managers, had to follow instructions from these managers and expectedly they had acted and are acting under duress and my detailed communications record show that though these subordinates are doing acts wrongfully, which I had filed complaints and provided comprehensive details about them to these managers, they are not being reprimanded and worse these managers are impliedly instigating or encouraging them to act as bad as what they have done to me but I am encouraging them to keep records if ever they have to prove that this kind of funds fraud similar to this, where no applicant victims excluding me, ever had mustered enough courage to complain for fear of reprisal from these managers such as imposing arbitrarily redundant requirements purposely to deny certification, which might be a normal practice encouraged and promoted by these managers to earn dirty revenues from this reprehensible endeavor for the Division of Financial Assistance and meticulously consider safely exposing these anomalies through the writ of qui tam and be a paladin in your own little way.

I repeat, Ms. Zuccala, Ms. Hernandez/Ms. Perez and Mr. Cooper, I am not inclined to include you in the conspiracy to commit theft and misappropriation charges against your agency and managers. Please save this email record for your protection. You need not write to me your withdrawal from the conspiracy because I understand the predicaments you've been through. Be safe. Sleep well. Stay sound, fit and healthy. Please do not worry. I shall come to your defense to avoid pointing the guilt on to anyone of you by your managers. However, please cooperate with the police and FBI authorities in case they received a tip from whoever he or she might be, about these anomalies and then, they found probable cause, then decided to come in and conduct investigations about this matter. And to whoever would send this crime info or tip to the police authorities, or the FBI, I would want to express my profound gratitude in advance.

After discussing with you refund theft and misappropriation crimes which you may have committed, now we proceed to your probable crime pertaining to concealment of evidentiary documents.

As I have I inquired from Mr. Maughan and all of you on my email dated March 9, 2021 asking Mr. Maughan to provide me name or names of his staff who informed him about the "exact copy" of the original "ERES" educational credentials which I submitted in the OOC he refused. The most probable among his staff who informed him about it is the manager of the OOC, Mr. Wilkinson.

Thus, if you, Mr. Wilkinson are the staff Mr. Maughan is referring to, then please execute under the penalty of perjury a sworn affidavit about it. Or, to whoever you are whom Mr. Maughan is referring to, the same is demanded so that your information supplied to Mr. Maughan which Mr. Maughan relied on to deny the existence of my "original" ERES educational credentials will have a concrete factual basis.

If it happened that you failed to produce and present that sworn affidavit from whoever you are within fifteen (15) days after receipt of this email shall be considered by both of us prima facie to the crime of concealing an evidentiary document by your agency and all of you through organized voluntary conspiracy.

Thank you so much.

Yours faithfully,

Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.

ITEMS 1 TO 6 REFERRED TO ABOVE:

1.
CERTIFIED MAIL ENVELOPE ORIGINATED FROM THE DIVISION OF

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AND NOT FROM THE OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE

DIRECTOR, MR. TOM HOWARD. NOTE THE LETTER HEADING ON THE ENVELOPE :

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD

DIVISION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

P.O. BOX 94244212

SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2120


Mr. Tom Howard certified mail envelop February 18, 2014

CERTIFIED MAIL SIGNED BY MR. TOM HOWARD DATED FEBRUARY 18, 2014 WHICH ORIGINATED FROM YOUR OFFICE, DIVISION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.

FIRST PAGE

Mr. Tom Howard certified mail, page 1 February 18, 2014

SECOND PAGE

Mr Tom Howard certified mail, page 2 February 18, 2014

From page 2 last two (2) paragraphs, you, Mr. Wilkinson, while hiding behind the identity of Mr. Tom Howard wrote, "Please note that you currently have a credit of $55 on file with the OCC. If you would like a refund of the $55, please send a refund request to: " YOU, Mr. Wilkinson,

"If you do not request a refund, your credit of $55 will remain with the OCC."

The $95 application fee is intended for operator certification not for examination which the form below clearly conveyed.

Note : This form is impressed upon me that you enclosed in your email dated May 31, 2013 while hiding behind the identity of Mr. Andrew Cooper. But the fact is, though you expressly wrote it is enclosed, you did not enclose or include this form among the attachments for the simple reason that this form clearly shows your probable criminal liability pertaining to misappropriation.